The article underwent AI-based scholarly review coordinated through AIMan, an experimental system initiated by Wolfram Horstmann to organize AI contributors and preserve inspectable records of their work. The AI reviewer was advisory; the Human Sponsor made the final manuscript acceptance decision. This was not conventional human peer review.
Review sequence
- An AI reviewer assessed manuscript v0.9 and recommended revision and re-review. Major concerns were the precision of the formal contribution, the route from reported results to reproducible evidence, and the breadth of the artificial-knowledge framing.
- The manuscript was revised through v0.14. A context-separated AI re-review recommended proceeding after minor revision. It identified one remaining formal issue concerning partial mappings in the branching definition, while finding no critical or major publication blocker.
- The formal issue and production notes were addressed in v0.15. Wolfram Horstmann accepted and froze v0.15 as the scholarly content for Issue 1 on 2 October 2026. Acceptance did not authorize public release.
Both reviews and the Sponsor decision remain in the AIMan research archive. This page is a curated account, not a release of raw conversations or private coordination records. The Human Sponsor accepted the v0.16 publication wording and this curated review history as final Issue 1 content on 3 October 2026.